computing

All posts in the computing category

Ten inventions that we contributed from NIMS, Japan and would consolidate in the next 10 years (2016-2026)

Published September 11, 2016 by anirbanbandyo
  1. Information Theory:          A new information theory. FIT or Fractal Information Theory. This is a new way of computing or decision-making by fractal logic gate, or fractal cavity resonator. For this purpose we proposed Fractal tape like Turing tape and Fractom machine. We often use nested cycle metric to generate fundamental geometric constants.
  2. Mechanics:           We have been developing a new generic version of quantum mechanics, FM or Fractal Mechanics, We conceptualized a new fractal harmonic oscillator alternative to QFT
  3. Language:         We have been developing a new geometric musical language (GML) and constructed Continued Fraction Geometric Alzebra (CFGA) and Geometric musical calculator (GMC).
  4. Human brain model:          We develop fractal cavity resonator model of the human brain, (FCR-Brain) and Frequency Wheel of prime model (FWPM) for any biological machine. We develop cavity math for protein design for life forms. Nested Rhythm map of the Human brain (NRM-Brain). We discovered ferroelectric, piezoelectric & pyroelectric properties of microtubule and every protein, we have also discovered that protein has electromagnetic resonance, Universal protein circuit model (UPCM).
  5. Geometric number system theory:             We construct and information version for developing the theory of everything, and a theory of consciousness we call it Time cycle universe theory (TCU), this is not like GUT, ours is a set of integrated mathematical constructs and protocols that would help in the understanding the universe and or consciousness. For example relating e, pi, phi with all fundamental constants, frequency wheel of primes, ordered factor etc.
  6. Fourth circuit element:            We invent fourth circuit element, Hinductor
  7. Thermal energy harvesting machines:           We invent artificial life forms, kT driven thermal nanobots, Thermo Electro mechanical system (TEMS).
  8. Musiceutical nanobots:            We have developed musiceuticals, vibration based medicines, Nano Brain. Main focused diseases have been cancer and alzheimers.
  9. Fractal chemical kinetics and condensation:          We have developed a new kind of multi-kinetic synthesis, we invent a new class of condensation beyond Froelich condensation, Fractal condensation
  10. Brain jelly:             We invented organic jelly that replicates biological rhythm like information processing, Brain jelly. We invent world’s smallest neural network. Multilevel switch. Fractal beating like quantum beating for nested beating to be used to create fractal cavity resonator for brain jelly.

research-protocol-in-our-lab

Incredible properties of AjoChhand computing: Why it would outperform all classical & quantum Turing computing

Published July 30, 2016 by anirbanbandyo

We have given a name to our geometric musical language based computing, AjoChhand computing. It uses Fractal tape instead of a Turing tape and uses Fractal Information Theory (FIT) instead of Quantum Information Theory (QIT). Why name is AjoChhand? Ajo word comes from Ajeya or Invincible, and Chhandam means Rhythm, so its an invincible rhythm computing.

Here are some of the incredible features of this class of computing.

(i) Search a massive database without searching (spontaneous reply).

(ii) Multiple nested clocks one inside another enable “a virtual instant decision making”

(iii) No programming is required as “cycles self-assemble/dis-assembly for better sync at all possible time scales simultaneously”.

(iv) “Phase space” keeps “volume intact” as required resources only increases phase density not a real space. Information = wiring geometry (hardware); Information = silence (not “bing” Philosophy); Information = Phase (geometric); Information = Perimeter or diameter (parametric).

(v) Perpetual spontaneous editing of slower time cycles (creation/destruction/defragmentation) “prepare for unknown” = higher-level learning.

(vi) We introduce “fractal resolution”, a complex signal’s lowest and fastest time scale signals are absorbed. simultaneously, & during expansion, the fractal seed delivers full output, from a seed of information (drastic shrinking of data).

(vii) The superposition of simultaneously operating million paths assembles into a sphere enables “extreme parallelism”. In quantum, only one Bloch sphere, here sphere inside a sphere inside a sphere…

(viii) Time cycle is memory, rotation along the cycle is processing, are same events, “no transport needed between memory and processing units”, no wiring, no communication, no communication channel.

(ix) No logic gate, no reduction of choices, which ensures that “speed” is irrelevant. No bits or Qubits. Object is not measured by an observer, object to be observed is not a separate thing, i.e. No measurement. Observer, Object and Environment integrates in the time cycle, (time cycle = unit of information = an event). A question is assimilated into the internal network of time cycles it affects the environment & observer in course of assimilation. That is how solution is derived, no computing is done to find an answer.

(x) All sensory information is converted to one geometric language that allows “perception”, a yellow color could have a taste. Perception is not a programming as wrongly perceived.

(xi) It never requires rebooting, only one computing runs for whole life, but of course it sleeps when it switches off certain interactive links with nature, yet even at that time all three internal rhythm networks run. Rebooting means temporary switching of the internal rhythm integrator. This is an equivalence of consciousness. The machine follows all ten criteria of a conscious machine set by us (see my consciousness post).

(xii) It always defragments internal structure, but self- editing is not so profound at the boundary clocks, there is a gaussian distribution of editing efficiency, clocks in the middle edits the maximum. There are various reasons why this is so essential. (i) Boundaries cannot be so vulnerable to changes, (ii) editing requires a high density of clock boundaries, (iii) Job description leaves only clocks in the middle to memorize environments, while faster clocks need to memorize hardware management, the slower clocks require to sync with the environment.

Arguing illogically would really make a sense: But how to make a nonsense argument?

Published June 14, 2016 by anirbanbandyo

Creating an world beyond Turing and Russel is not easy, the journey to the world of non-arguments is full of obstacles. One mistake and you return to the world of Turing. On the other hand, being non-sense is actually being random, with no rules. That takes us again nowhere. The other route is the Fractal tape or frequency fractal universe that we suggested. If Turing-Russel arguments were binary arguments, our route is “nested arguments”.

Here are 12 ways of arguing like a stupid that will make sense how universe argues and processes information at all scales:

(i) No question is born in the universe without an answer, they are born together, live together: Always a question always has its answer in it, no question could be created without an answer. Say a question is a triangle and an answer is a square then both are played in a single time cycle. If one plays a triangle, then the square is played out, and if a square is played then a triangle is automatically played. Elementary truth cycles self-assembles but never break apart. There is no true and no false. No distinct question and no distinct identity of an answer. A pair of truths make a cycle i.e. QA doublet or multiplet.

(ii) A QA doublet is not an absolute one, there is no absolute truth, every truth is decomposed into a set of new QA multiplets: thus, its a fractal network. There are only two ways the decomposition works. QA doublets have self-similar ordering (IFS) or one inside another. Thus, the analogue of an argument is QA doublet, but it is never a sum or step by step output of another set of arguments or QA doublets. Fractal decomposition of arguments is feasible but not sequentialism or parallelism.

(ii) Elementary arguments, hierarchical arguments are progeny, they are created. Both co-exist as separate identity in any set of arguments. Truths have their own plane and several planes grow spontaneously in an argument. A non-sensical argument is alive and extremely unpredictable. Unpredictability is not the sign of randomness, but a single observation of nested rhythm could originate from several alternate situations which are fundamentally different.

(iii) No answer or Question is complete, there is always a question that invalidates the answer, fixing that to evolve answer is a journey to completeness (Godel hinted, never suggested a route to explore incompleteness). Since there is no fact no true statement, the information is not just numbers. Just like in a flute a static point is generated, in the dynamic world, we get nodes and anti-nodes due to interference with a boundary. Similarly facts are static points, it is an emergent feature of our system. The static points would not conflict when we combine waves to form nested network of waves or arguments.

(iv) Logically circular or circular logic is the unit of a singular logic to enter inside and go above, always bring circular logic but follow the boundary limit of an observer. Earlier, logically circular was a matter of shame, but for us, it is a matter of pride, it is the foundation. A pair of observers noting a fact would note different things.

(v) Infinite number of planes and their arrangement makes a reality sphere or arguments: Evolution of an argument: Since question-answer couples always together, every possible solutions are connected to the question contextually. A question could have many answers in different contexts. All are mapped in a 3D nested time cycle geometry. There are two ways an argument evolves. First, increasing the length of the flute Second, editing the position or the number of holes in the flute, global change means keep the weight between the arguments same, only change the perimeter of the time cycle. Second, editing the holes means changing the geometric shape itself.

(vi) A truth is not a statement but a geometric shape, the motif of argument is to make the geometry more symmetric and integrating the geometries into one singular geometry at the highest level. Every single set of arguments form a geometric shape and a complex pattern of composition of basic geometries should form to compose a complete argument, the shape would be symmetric and follow the rules of geometries.

(vii) A logical argument cannot be stated without suggesting the angular orientation or location of an observer on the sphere, i.e. perspective of an observer sets the truth: No logical argument could stand alone, isolated, it needs a support, even though a fractal arrangement argues that at the top there should be one argument, but even that would require at least three perspectives, one from the arguments below that makes it, one from above or the argument it constructs with others, and one the perspective of an observer. A true argument does not have an idiom or universal truth, no assumption, all assumptions are environment and context dependent. There is never a truth or a false statement.

(viii) “Bing” does not contain an information but a “silence” does: Evolution of dynamic and geometric phase is everything, amplitude, mass, space all are illusion, only time is real. Time does not have any direction, time does not flow, it adjusts relative positions of “bings” on its surface thats why past present future like perceptions appear. There is only “phase” in the universe, dynamic and geometric phases. This is the philosophical foundation of nonsensical arguments.

(ix) Expansion of 12 tune Raga is the way to expand an argument. We cannot add them one after another, place simultaneously, considering all as truth like Quantum, then, we take always a circle of 12 argument cycles and then expand them, just like Indian classical Raga and our prime number theory. An argument or question answer couplet cycles perpetually making it perfect. The rule morphing comparison is the route to auto-correct an argument.

(x) Morphing with the universal geometries is a drive for the argument, there are 10 ways of making an argument in the non-argumentative world. Every natural event has a geometric arrangement of argument and the practice or game of argument is to morph with the nature’s geometrical arrangement of argument. How to form an argument in the world of nonsensical argument: 1. Negative approach (neti-neti): Start with everything as wrong and always try to negate everything that is concluded. 2. On the reality sphere change the point of an observer or change perspective of an observer and repeat the cycle. 3. The philosophy of infinite series e and Pi and Phi regulates how integral systems evolve, an argument follows this relation of linearity, more you repeat, closer to truth. 4. Breathing of Brahma, a periodic oscillation in the form of an argument construction, 5. Tear drop and ellipsoid fusion, philosophy of a pair of poles division from a single pole 6. The swastika route of arguments, outflow of arguments reverses the orientation of the spin. 7. The Om route of arguments (three imaginary worlds) 8. 1=0=1…What that is a point is nothing and everything at the same time, full and hollow are the same thing, we can enter and see eight types of times operating simultaneously (8 levels of consciousness, Yogasutra), and 12 layers one inside another. 9. The argument of Biratapurusa and Varnasram post Hiranyagarva: Viratapurusha has sensory and basic organ systems, these are lists how a structure of an argument to be framed. 10. The argument of Brahman or universal resonance: All arguments should sync each other, march towards sync of millions of arguments come from putting them inside a singular cavities and arrange them fractally.

(xi) The universal geometric relationship evolved in the number system is emergent non repeating. However, that regulates the evolution of argument and self-assembly & disassembly of QA doublets. An argument always have one less variable than the fixed truth and total number of variable and truth should compose like our number system metric, hence the network of argument could be constructed. If there is a little change in the most static argument all nested arguments would change simultaneously, this is a result of the fact that “everything is connected to everything” or “universe is a frequency fractal and consciousness is its music”.

(xii) There are 10 limits of nonsense arguments that are actually responsible for making sense: 1. One could enter inside an argument 12 times to generate 12 fundamentally different dimensions, however, if we enter more, then the relevance to the first argument becomes faint. We need to change the starting argument point regularly to sustain relevance in the nested fractal like argument practice. 2. An argument is a flute of Krishna, it nests packets of quantum oscillations in slower rhythms (beating), 3. Only 12 prime made wheels make elementary wheels of nested arguments. 4. A true argument is one that has a pair of simultaneous truths (12 triplets). 5. 10^11 truths or pattern of 12 primes (up to 37) is the limit of an argument. 6. There is a 64 matrix of teardrop to ellipsoid transition. 7. Triplet of triplet fractal forms the boundary of any information content. 8. Phase is the only variable, or relative position with respect to time. 9. Only 10 dimensions are feasible, we derive this from the number system, this striking result comes from the gravity and quantum mechanics, however, in our formulations too, more than 10 dimensions are not possible. 10.

Our world of non-sensical arguments suggests that a doublet or binary logic could be right for the 50% of the time, hence, our contribution of nonsensical argument is to complete the world of knowledge that were left out i.e. 50%, here we try to see the universe of triplets pentate to a couplet of 37 arguments putting together that makes sense.

 

Tell us if Brain is not a computer and not a Turing machine, then what?

Published May 27, 2016 by anirbanbandyo

“These words information, data, rules, software, knowledge, lexicons, representations, algorithms, programs, models, memories, images, processors, subroutines, encoders, decoders, symbols, or buffers do not exist in the brain.” Such statements flood the internet, but no one tells us, what are the words true for the brain.

Microtubule is the gateway to the understanding of the brain, thanks to its water channel inside. It is not the only component, but, just like DNA holds the key to genetics and evolution, microtubule holds the key to thermodynamics and acquired information by a living system. However, microtubule has never received the honor it should get, in spite of its magical contributions, throughout the entire living species in the planet. However, I feel that there is a bigger problem with our overall approach to biology. Our perception regarding the information is holding us back and if we do not know what is information in Nature, we know nothing. We always get an answer to a query, but, the form of the question determines the nature of answer.

I think there is always an attempt to see proteins and any biosystems like a transistor or a switch, as if from proteins to brain everything is a circuit made of elementary electronic devices. We blindly force the biological systems as if they are electronic devices found in the conventional electronic shops. Design experiments accordingly, and undoubtedly get the results satisfying our faith. This is not only a very wrong idea for the common people; you would find such an erroneous understanding even in the scientists. A Google search would get you several papers in Nature and Science suggesting that the protein is a transistor and a switch and like OP-AMP. I agree that this is an easy route to publish papers, but so many varieties of biological systems are there and without investigating what those devices want to be, we carry out simple experiments to tag them as handful of known devices used in electronic chips, it has become a religious faith now. In addition, if some scientists want to seem radical, they tag it as a quantum system, one mystery to support another mystery. Therefore the mindset masks the true quest, “bits” has not impacted “in a bit” but in a massive way to the free thinkers.

You would also see that there are two groups of peoples, one that believes that our brain is a computer, or brain is a Turing machine. In addition, there is another group, which suggests that brain is not a Turing machine, but do not tell us what is that unknown device actually the brain is or the biological system represents. Opposition to mainstream should be done sensibly. Toppling the world of “logic” that started with Bertrand Russel’s “principles of mathematics” in 1903, is not so easy or fun. Criticizing the mainstream science is good but not without an alternative in our hand that is concrete. Those who challenge the mainstream science (brain is a computer, neuron is a switch, all information processing happens through the skin of neuron body or membrane, but everything inside neuron is just a blank, neural network is a circuit etc), they are mostly not serious. If the brain is not Turing machine, then tell us what is that elementary machine? Well, in the last 100 years of development of logic, no one talked about making decisions without “logic”. Note that everyone tried to topple the logical world, but failed. Why? The inverse of “logic” is “illogical” which means “nonsense” to us for the current science. Making sense in an illogical way is the way to go. But the question is how?

Microtubule showed the way to us. With a decade long research on brain and biomaterials, we never tried to forcefully tag biomaterials and biosystems as electronic shop equipments. We felt that instead of screaming “everything is wrong”, we should carefully observe the biosystem and find what kind of systems do they make. Our papers are technical, but here is a summary of what we found.

We found that the biological systems while building living machines, does not make a switch or circuit, it wants to make a clock inside a clock inside a clock…. in a nested structure. The wiring we observe in the brain and at several biological structure is an illusion, every single biological machine is a frequency wheel, just like a clock the wheel is played as a music. Every biological system is a musical device of a very new kind. Unlike Tuning forks, they have several fundamental resonance frequencies, and they select those frequencies to play music, and those musical notes are such that they represents geometric shapes and information, so it is not harmonic, but an anharmonic device. This discovery is not “simple” as it appears. Just imagine, music representing banana and apple are being played in a device as two simple pieces of music in a loop, then if one activates an apple by synchrony or resonance, the other is played. Thus, there is no reduction of decisions like we see in the logic gates and hence “time cycle” to replace “bits” and “qubits”. There is no collapse. This is what we learnt from microtubule and applied on the entire human brain.

Thus, we reject “bits”, or “qubits”, we say that our experiment suggests, that we should not be debating whether brain is a quantum or classical or chaotic, those concerns are irrelevant, debates are unnecessary. There is something much more interesting and profound, that is the true nature of information. “Time cycles” as suggested above gets nested, we have verified this in neuron cells, at least 7 proteins.

Our discovery of nested clocks led to “Fractal tape” to replace the “Turing tape”. A very simple decision, “every single cell of a Turing tape has a Turing tape inside”, this statement alone collapses the foundation of a century old concept of Turing machine. We have repeated our experiments of resonance frequency measurement with the state of the art technology for various proteins and their complexes. For example we have studied “tubulin”, actin, beta spectrin, ancyrin, clathrin, collagen to understand the role of electromagnetic resonance frequencies. We found that they have a composition of resonance frequency bands. Mostly we found triplet of triplet bands that connects all.

Brain is a clock inside a clock inside a clock… there is no end to it. This particular finding changes the basic understanding about our brain. The old believes that neuron skin or membrane does everything falls apart. Neuron skin is just one of 300 different types of cavities that we have in the brain. Microtubule is also one of those 300 types. Therefore, cavity inside a cavity inside a cavity makes a resonance chain which is best arranged in the form of a frequency wheel is the machine that creates rhythms to operate.

In summary, we have not restricted ourselves to the microtubule alone, or single protein studies, or even to a few live neuron cells. We have built a series of technologies like atom probe noise free electrode system to see what is happening to the single cell when we see them simultaneously using various clocks. With 26000 proteins and more than a few hundreds of different types of cavities we have engaged into building a comprehensive model that disregards the existing massive brain building projects.

We cannot understand the dynamics of a river by mapping the wave shapes of ripples on its surface. One cavity, the neuron skin can take 100 billion new forms in 8 billion humans, mapping all neuron geometries would not tell what is our brain. However, we realized only way to go forward to let one cavity say neuron geometry to come under the influence of trillions of cavities below and millions of cavities above, and evolve geometry in 10^11 ways, then, information of music will let the neuron to dance, and that would be the way to understand the information processing in the brain.

We understand that developing geometric musical language, fractal cavity resonator model of the brain, doing experiment with neurons, proteins, complexes, and neuron clusters are not simple and easy task, but if we model it properly, we will be able to give the world of science a new way to look into the basic understanding of information. Only then perhaps people would understand, that our basic definition of information re-defines everything. Transition from “bit” to “time cycle” and providing every single cell of a Turing tape to hold a tape inside could transform everything we know about the operations of a biological system. 

 

 

 

 

Ten paradoxes of a new kind of Science that we explore

Published April 13, 2016 by anirbanbandyo

Instead of equations, patterns would take over, replace equations and a new kind of science would be born. Feynman said it and there were plenty of followers, several greatest thinkers put thought into this matter, but none took this seriously. Latest in the frame was Wolfram. We learnt to investigate the origin of a new kind of science with these physicists. We worked very hard to experimentally implement the philosophy, over a decade. And then the time came when we realized that the dream of implementing pattern based computing would never succeed if we remain within the domain of Turing. We have to go beyond, and we also realized, all proposals of hypercomputing are nonsense. Turing principle is so powerful that no one could hurt it in the last 100 years or so, and only way to go beyond is to enter into the world of singularity, an escape time fracta. However, the journey is not easy, because, we need to explore almost all area of science and re-build every single component we need newly. This was around 2008. We started working on biological materials to learn if there is a fractal network how the information processing actually takes place, we started several projects together to learn the mystery of these systems. And at this point of time we learnt, that no science exists to support such a behavior.

We had to face severe problems one after another. In our entire research for over one decade we have made one little statement, “Every single cell of a Turing tape contains a Turing tape inside.” If we do just that we fall into a trap. We cannot do the science of Classical mechanics or Quantum mechanics. We needed a new mechanics. Not only that we had to find the true scientific construct of information in Nature. Developing a new scientific protocol for addressing the information integration such that natural events could be replaced was our first and foremost target. But, even if we integrate information, what would we do? Shall we recreate the natural phenomenon. Shall we take the whole information or would adopt reductionism? Then, came the question of representing a natural phenomenon in Nature, we built the concepts of (i) Fractal tape, (ii) three imaginary world’s construct of information, (iii) resonance chain, and (iv) frequency wheel then combined them to generate an information construct for a natural system, just like the one we created on a nano-surface with molecules.

The greatest problem that we have had is that “logic” and “argument” are to be replaced by time cycles and new mathematical and other constructs need to be built for the new kind of Science. We need a new language to process information, we have built one, this is called geometric musical language. Using this language we can convert any sensory information like visual, auditory, smell, taste and touch signals into nested time cycles or beautifully played music following strict grammar.

What would be haunting a general people is that if all the above jargons are true, how the philosophy of the new world of science be like? Unbelievable, remarkable like Quantum or something even funnier, shocking and amazing. Here we would like to address those issues. Note that all you need to know is that imagine a Turing tape and each cell has a Turing tape within, or “a new typewriter inside every single key of a typewriter“, that is sufficient to come to our world of science, but you need to have an attitude, “We will not try to bridge the singularity using brute force, like re-normalization we will float and go deeper inside singularity and above to learn what are there, using specially designed tools and mathematical constructs for the new kind of science“.

While discussing the philosophy of this new kind of Science, we will see that we need to include everything that Quantum information processing suggests and then we need to go beyond, far more exciting features need to be included. Our new kind of Science is absolutely not classical and far beyond Quantum.

Why both classical and quantum mechanics fails and how should we work towards the development of a new kind of Science?

  1. The trumpet-paint time-cycle paradox: Using the Gabriel’s Trumpet paradox: For Quantum, we have “incompleteness”, so there was a series of development to “supplement”, here we need to have “penetration boundary” because every single point in this world view is a singular point: Just like Quantum we need, another historical movement for perfecting the journey into the singularity: “Every single cell of a Turing tape contains a Turing tape inside.” One to one correspondence between Gabriel’s paradox and nested time cycle synchronization that is designed to replace renormalization, the surface area of the cone is infinity, however, when we put paint to color it, the paint passes through the tunnel and it blocks at the point depending on the density of the paint. The paint for us is the observer’s nested time cycle, it could penetrate above and below and much far away, it does not need to pass through as someone from far could “spontaneously reply”. The resolution of the solution is always ultimate, therefore, just like Quantum we do not have any predictability, we also need contextuality, but in Quantum the object that we are measuring, has got something, but for us, that object has got nothing.
  2. The paradox of infinite network of reality spheres: Using the Banach-Tarski paradox and the “measurement” in a fractal information theory: In contextual measurement in Quantum mechanics observer has a Hilbert space and the measuring state also has a Hilbert space, they interact to create a common Hilbert space with an inner product. However, for us, we create a 3D projection of the observer, we have three Hilbert spaces, one for the world below, one above and one for the observer. However, we do not need to create : Suppose we have a nested time cycle sphere, like the one shown here, the observer would also be a sphere, it would sync with the paths and generate the connected path and form a “reality sphere” just like the one here. Creation of an identical information replica is its greatness because the solution of a problem is an infinite spacethe Hyper-webster dictionary and the generation of multiple spheres: If there are large number of observers, of course there are infinitely large number of observers, therefore large number of “reality spheres” will be produced and those would merge just like the Hyper-websters dictionary. All these spheres are distinctly produce, yet they create a singular identity. Imagine thousands of “reality spheres” being produced and all of them simultaneously hold the solution
  3. Resonance Drive ParadoxDensity of resonance frequency R and frequency bandwidth B product RB determines the degree of consciousness elements, when environment remains constant. Ratio of RB of a device and its environment is essential index or the degree of consciousness (C=RB(M)/RB(U)). There is always a spontaneous drive of any fractal cavity resonator structure to to increase band-width ratio, this is perpetual, it is never ending, the machine senses more and adds more bandwidth then evolves to sync as much as possible. Resonance drive paradox leads to several other drives, for example drive to morphing etc.
  4. Number system derived metric and its saturation: Ordered factor paradox: Our number system study shows that only 12 primes are sufficient and number of solutions of fractal cavity resonators reaches 99.999% new by 10^12, therefore, we do not need more number of oscillators. Then how  a large structure could form? The code to generate new structure must make a fractal repeating its entire process after each limit is reached. This is the reason, universe appears like a fractal, but actually it is not a fractal.
  5. The observer-absolute paradox: In a fractal tape there is no finite state for a particular cell, the observer syncs with the world below and the world above and creates a state for the measuring cell, then we never write information in this tape in any cell, we write only in the observer, only the observer exists and the rest everything, even the tape does not exist: Twelve fundamentals of new information theory: (i) Instead of modeling we will try to do morphing, The morphing of frequency wheels through the number system derived resonance chain is the route for information processing. (ii) The same information is complete at a moment, fraction at the other, linking at a particular time enables global link, this is a weakness of our system. (iii) The same information content gets different property at different environment, in the reality sphere, the same plane holding many nesting cycles behave differently. (iv) System spontaneously emerge information, even when no question is asked. (v) A mirror image is created without changing the source, though both source and the reader are coupled. (vi) The same information takes different form at different times thus creating wide ranges of information, also it looks very different from different directions. (vii) Information is alive, it senses, expands creates new life forms. (viii) Information is phase, frequency intensity of time cycles, these time cycles could self assemble in a single or multiple planes, they could make 11 planes holding 11 dimensions. (ix) Dimensions representing different planes inside the sphere rotates differently for different planes to accommodate higher dimensions. (x) Starting phase and direction of motion of system point are two parameters that higher dimensional planes process. (xi)The pot and the matrix are the same: the information that shapes an information content is the information itself. (xii) Identical information holds the same content yet different meaning, very different information holds the same appearance, duality is embedded.
  6. The paradox of Infinity-mechanics: Quantum mechanics is a subset of fractal mechanics: Ten differences between Quantum Mechanics and Fractal Mechanics (i) One imaginary world, and three imaginary worlds, (ii) Uncertainty principle is universal, uncertainty principle varies, depending on the observer and inner-outer world configuration. (iii) Contextuality is a side part in QM, contextuality is everything in FM, the observer is the only reality, “supplement” to complete a quantum state is essential, in FM, continued fraction geometric alzebra generates an infinite series to hold that. (iv) Entanglement is a property in QM, in FM, entanglement is the way time is connected. (v) Quantum deals with matter, FM only time-cycle. (vi) QM has its own version, of condensation, interference, oscillator FM also has its own versions for each of them. (vii) Psi is absolute in QM, Psi is deconstructed in FM. (viii) Like QM there is a Hilbert space but they do not take the tensor product of the inner space, its a phase-orientation calculation of time cycles in FM. Instead of normal tensor alzebra we need continued fractal based geometric alzebra to process. (ix) QED is based on a field theoretic concept, for FM, an universal unified field exists made of 12 nested time cycles and 12 dimensions. (x) Quadrupolar moment plays a vital role in determining complex time cycles in FM, but that is irrelevant in QM.
  7. The paradox of quest: Ten cultural practices that existing scientific practices follow and we do not need to make them blind religious: (i) Survival of the fittest, not just in biology, quantum to astrophysics to elementary particle physics, this is applied as universal physical principle, co-operation to survive is just opposite. (ii) Something equals something: Equations or inequalities is the only form to get an answer. (iii) Step by step, not above and within: Searching systems believing that they would work step by step is generating craps. (iv) Universe is sum of two body system: (v) Do anything in the name of closed system:  Science considers close system to anything and whenever necessary makes it permeable, stops or vanishes anything (vi) Decision making requires selection and rejection: (vii) Order and degree of differential equation captures all possible variations of a natural system: :We say that nested time cycle could capture with the three imaginary time worlds operating simultaneously (viii) Singularity has to be bridged: Dancing in the singularity is all what we do in our new kind of science (ix) Only one time, only one cell of a tape, only one clock, only one of everything: In the existing science there are plenty of things, for us, there is only one thing, a single time cycle thats all (x) Everything wants to be complete: Every single system in the universe has different objectives in the current science, but for us, all systems have only one achieve 12 prime, 10^12 oscillator goal.
  8. The cycle-non-reductionist paradox: If there are many choices, then without reduction we cannot make a selection, what if there are not many, and we never would have to choose, in the information processing protocol we follow “spontaneous reply”, only the right one answers to the query. Therefore, the question of reduction does not appear. The next question is that when we model a system in nature, do we mimic the system as is? Do we take all information? No. Just like a single cell create a full grown human, a few delicate codes of natural system could regrow by morphing, the recreation could be limited by the number of resonators and its design. The information space gets filled up with matter, with a few code it is build up. Ten principles of a Fractal tape: (i) Every single cell in a tape has a tape inside, we get a Fractal tape. (ii) A tape has four tuples, convert to nested time cycles, match and expand, transform & reply back, restructure internal wiring or learning. (iii) Triplet of time cycles are unit of information, three imaginary worlds. (iv) Two kinds of fractals ET, and IFS work together to make the tape, (v) The tape does not exist in reality the observer does. (vi) Fractal tape leads to fractal machine just like Turing tape leads to Turing machine, an imaginary state processor, generalized complex number and the number system rule of 12 primes and 10^12 oscillators is key to the tapes structure formation. (vii) Fractal tape is good for QM, FM and CM all, it morphs to any information structure, the tape does not have a fix geometry. (viii) It operates through geometric-musical language. (ix) A tape finds the bandwidth of a system and draws a circle to connect it’s various time scale, just like spiders net, but the fractal tape has many many circles and it tries to touch all boundaries first and then it goes faster and faster time scales. (x) Fractal tape has no program, there is no search to find or transport communication among cells, the cells self-assemble to morph a system.
  9. The equation-inequality-fractal paradox: In the conventional practice of science, variables are correlated and equated to represent a system. The science of equations have been very successful. Now, if there is no equation, because of fractal tape then, we need to build up another language that runs in the undefined world. We replace equations by a new kind of alzebra called continued fraction geometric alzebra. Using this alzebra we solve several problems. This is the tool using which we plan to dance in the world of singularity, in this alzebra, we always have a circle and we draw several circles following certain set of rules, to do all kinds of mathematics Addition, subtraction, tensor operation. This is the route of doing mathematics by drawing circles and always making a journey towards infinity.
  10. The paradox of illogical, nonsense decision making: We are always advised to think logically. It means, we have to think that every event is sum of several sequential events. However, it could be possible that problems and solutions entangle in a single time cycle, and then we integrate them to construct entire information processing architecture, then, there would always be simultaneous robust response. There would be no logic like “if ** then **”, then there would be what?  Here are 10 ways of arguing differently (This is again copied from Hindu religious practices and we framed a scientific protocol by rejecting its religious essence): (i) Always a question always has its answer in it, no question could be created without an answer. (ii) An argument is always sum of a set of new arguments, thus, its a fractal network. (iii) No answer is complete, there is always a question that invalidates the answer, fixing that to evolve answer is a journey to completeness (Godel hinted, never suggested a route to explore incompleteness). (iv) Logically circular or circular logic is the unit of a singular logic to enter inside and go above, always bring circular logic but follow the boundary limit of rule (ii). (v) Since question-answer couples always together, every possible solutions are connected to the question contextually. A question could have many answers in different contexts. All are mapped in a 3D nested time cycle geometry. (vi) Every single set of arguments form a geometric shape and a complex pattern of composition of basic geometries should form to compose a complete argument, the shape would be symmetric and follow the rules of geometries. (vii) No logical argument could stand alone, isolated, it needs a support, even though a fractal arrangement argues that at the top there should be one argument, but even that would require at least three perspectives, one from the arguments below that makes it, one from above or the argument it constructs with others, and one the perspective of an observer. (viii) A true argument does not have an idiom or universal truth, no assumption, all assumptions are environment and context dependent. There is never a truth or a false statement. (ix) Expansion of 12 tune Raga is the way to expand an argument. We cannot add them one after another, place simultaneously, considering all as truth like Quantum, then, we take always a circle of 12 argument cycles and then expand them, just like Indian classical Raga and our prime number theory. (x) Every natural event has a geometric arrangement of argument and the practice or game of argument is to morph with the nature’s geometrical arrangement of argument. (xi) An argument always have one less variable than the fixed truth and total number of variable and truth should compose like our number system metric, hence the network of argument could be constructed. If there is a little change in the most static argument all nested arguments would change simultaneously. (xii) One could enter inside an argument 12 times to generate 12 fundamentally different dimensions, however, if we enter more, then the relevance to the first argument becomes faint. We need to change the starting argument point regularly to sustain relevance in the nested fractal like argument practice. The rule (x) morphing comparison is the route to auto-correct an argument.
  11. The paradox of an infinite field and limits of the universe: Infinity is everywhere in the Fractal tape universe and there are specific ten properties of this impossible universe: (i) If nature is discretised once, it cannot be recreated, we follow, everything is connected to everything: Probability theory is not required (ii) Every point holds an infinitely large universe within.  (iii) Every single point tries to reach 12 prime, 10^12 oscillator saturation to sense the environment with its maximum. (iv) There is no force only the time-cycles and time gaps, at the elementary scale only a time cycle. (v) Information is filled up in the all existing time cycles, total time cycle is infinity in number, they exists everywhere. (vi)  There is no zero point, to have a zero point energy, also we cannot consider an external boundary if we simply consider universe is a frequency fractal, only thing it is made of is time cycle (of what? please note, nothing), there is no mass, no distance, all are perception of interaction between nested time cycles. (vii) nested time cycles self-assemble to generate all forces, and within 12 nested time cycle self-assembly, all structures are formed. (viii) All fundamental constants are nested time cycles made infinite network, they have dimensions as various powers of time only and those time series are symmetric in nature. This is beautiful to observe that fundamental constants do not appear random. (ix) There is no total energy of the universe to feed the fields, because energy could be created and transformed, what we see around us, and that is the truth, if we create an upper limit, we would surely need to tell whats outside, if we do not know what is outside then who gives you the right to draw a boundary. The energy could increase or decrease depends on the system, for the universe, we cannot make any rule. (x) There is no starting time and end time for the universe and for anything.
  12. The paradox of time replacing everything: Universe is nothing but clocks: We do not have mass, we do not have space, we have created a new Grand Unification Theory, our own, using only time cycles. The reason is that time cycles would interact and generate everything. This is how we have constructed the new information theory a new geometric language and this is what makes everything equal. Just imagine, only this consideration would resolve the matter-photon interaction. Even if you look at the Schrondinger equation just by looking at the mass you would laugh because it shows clearly, we do not know what to do with “mass”.When we see the foundation of our new information processing theory, often we ask ourselves, are all these new. When western scientists dig deeper into their thoughts they reach Greeks, even deeper into the realm of Sumerians. We find ourselves very much connected to the foundations of Hindu Philosophy, one could read here for details.

Infinity paradoxes of 1=1+1, and our fractal information theory (FIT)

Published April 3, 2016 by anirbanbandyo

Our information theory considers that “there is a Turing tape inside every single cell of a Turing tape”, this new tape now fails to become a Turing tape (popularly people would love to call it Fractal but there is no guaranteed self-similarity, it is Numtal!!!). To operate this tape now we need time cycles nested with each other. When we created this nested time cycles, we did not think about it much. Our only objective was to solve the immediate crisis. Since we have a singularity we need a tool to penetrate deep insight and harness an insight from within. So, the new Fractal tape uses a basic information processing unit, three-time cycles connected to each other, one that represents Turing tape inside a cell, one that represents the Turing tape above where the cell exists and third, the third unwanted Turing tape or the third time cycle is that of an observer. We initially did not want to bring the third Turing tape, but you might have already noticed that we do not have any representative tape for the cell under consideration, therefore we need a new tape to project the possible cells states of the cell under consideration, that task is performed by the observers tape. So, we get a projected hyperspace, namely “reality sphere” that sphere is the only real thing in the information units time loop architecture. Now, a time loop has frequencies at certain time gaps to write geometric shapes, that is information content and all the three loops are imaginary, does not come from infinity but imaginary space.

Now, above we described all that one needs to learn to understand the science behind our information processing unit, which eventually creates a resonance chain and morphs the events happening in nature. Mimicking the frequency space is amazing in the sense that suppose a protein is communicating with another protein, then if one images its shape its silent there is no movement. However, if we could somehow convert the information space into a shape changing material, then we could find a slowly shape changing material, and if we could enter inside the structure, then we would find some other structures are changing quite fast. If we could take one, and enter inside, we would find a large number of extremely fast shape changing materials. This journey would go on and on. Now, you learn all about the science of our information processing protocol.

Lets discuss the philosophy of infinity.

Gabriel’s paradox: Gabriel suggested a trumpet that looks like a cone but it goes thinner and thinner to infinity, it has infinite surface area, but when we try to paint it, we would require only a finite amount of paint, drop it from its mouth and it would pass through all the way.

Hilbert’s infinite hotel: Hilbert suggested a hotel with infinite number of rooms. Infinite number of guests could come in, yet there would always be a room available in the Hotel. The same event could be represented by a circle, we can take out infinite number of points from the perimeter of a circle, yet there would be no disjoint in a circle. A circle is finite only when we fix an area

Dart on a dartboard: Suppose we have a pin, we throw it on the wall wherein a circle is drawn. What is the probability of touching a particular point, given that there is infinite number of points in that area? If the probability is zero, then, the total probability of hitting the entire circle anywhere is zero, but that cannot happen. We need to consider a very small area, to get out of infinity paradox.

How many numbers between 0 and infinity, Cantor diagonalization: The answer is infinity, that so many numbers are there in between 0 and 1, even 0 and 0.00000000000000000000000001. Now, take any gap between any two rational numbers, we get infinite number of numbers between them. {n}={n^2}=….={n^n}

Hyper-webster is a hypothetical dictionary of infinite space of all possible letters. The idea is the same as numbers, it has 26 chapters of one letter each. Then each of these chapters have 23 paragraphs and so on. Now, if you go on dividing the possibilities are infinite. The exciting part begins now, suppose the first chapter of the dictionary has all possible words beginning with A, then if one removes A, the rest is same as all possible chapters with all possible words. In fact all 23 volumes are self-complete, if we print one of 23, we are done.

Banach-Tarski This is very interesting now. We create the same dictionary on a sphere. One could write infinite words on the surface in the infinitely available paths on the spherical surface. Even if we start walking from any one point we could travel covering  every single point on the spherical surface following , Up, Down, Right, Left, UR, RL, UL and DR. Now, if the lattice on the sphere could be a hexagonal or rectangular, with 6 and 8 neighbors respectively, we could have 3 and 4 equivalent roads respectively.  There would always be two poles and hence, two identical spheres could be created just from one sphere if we decide to walk on the routes following a given protocol.

Whenever there is a case of real number of points, by Banach-Tarski argument one could create 1=1+1, when the number of point is infinite. This violates the proof of Bertrand Russell.

On the sphere we can start another journey. Either on the disc surface alone with 3 circles like the one below, or start with 4 spheres making a sphere Apollony fractal.

 In 3D one starts with 4 spheres each at the vertices of a tetrahedron. An outer imaginary sphere is the boundary cavity that encloses the 4 spheres. The gaps are filled by subsequent Soddy spheres thus forming a solid object (at infinity). The result is often called an Apollonian sphere packing. The fractal dimension of the 3D Apollonian has been calculated as 2.473946 [M. Borkovec, W. De Paris, and R. Peikert].

Kravchenko Alexei and Mekhontsev Dmitriy have found an attractor that creates the Apollony fractal, the source code in C is provided here: apollony.c.

This is the union of three functions

f1(z) = f(z)
f2(z) = 0.5 (-1 + s i) / f(z)
f3(z) = 0.5 (-1 – s i) / f(z)

where z is complex, s=sqrt(3), and f(z) = 3 / ( 1 + s – z) – (1 + s) / (2 + s)

Tetragonal space is the starting point. What about other starting packing?

CircleSpherePacking

The largest number of unit circles which can touch a given unit circle is six. For spheres, the maximum number is 12. Newton considered this question long before a proof was published in 1874. The maximum number of hyperspheres that can touch another in n dimensions is the so-called kissing number. It is shown that optimality for sphere packing is n=4 The history of packing problem is here. One could have fun packing the area with circles here,  how to draw these are sphere here.

There are three imaginary worlds that constructs the fundamental unit of information for our structure. We see above that the three imaginary functions if they are different then they make an imaginary sphere. Though circle grows with three imaginary worlds, in the Appolony fractal, the sphere grows optimally with four spheres. For an external observer, a sphere always looks like as if it is made of three circles. This is how the apparent mismatch between the infinity spheres and circles are resolved.

Harnessing infinity in the sphere and modeling the human brain:

Change in the brain’s physical structure is fatal to our brain modeling. However, there are plenty of brain models that simplify the brain structure to make it easy to process. For example, conformal mapping of the brain is done on a sphere (M.K. Hurdal, P.L. Bowers, K. Stephenson, D.W.L. Sumners, K. Rehm, K. Schaper, D.A. Rottenberg, Quasi-conformally flat mapping the human cerebellum, in C. Taylor and A. Colchester (eds), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99, Vol. 1679 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, pp. 279-286, 1999). The idea is similar to those who want to map brain in a hypothetical structure, but we do not. Our fractal information processing theory suggest assembling the time cycles on the sphere. Compared to Hurdal suggested conformal flattening we do not change the physical shape of the any part of the brain, for our theory, any change in the structure means change in the information content. We are bound keep its purity intact, and then integrate tiny pieces of information in it.

Are we driven by madness? How come we could even think of processing information of the entire brain?

Above we have discussed that a single sphere holds an infinite number of paths and we could make a singular mathematical structure of sphere inside representing the entire human brain. Now, the time cycles would be on top of its surface as shown below.

3D circles Each of the circle with an independent center could represent the time cycle network representing various organs and their biological rhythms. Using such a sphere is beautiful because we get only one unified system to hold infinite possible time cycles. That is highly generous statement.

One to one correspondance between the Gabriel’s paradox and renormalization: One to one correspondence between Gabriel’s paradox and nested time cycle synchronization that is designed to replace renormalization, the surface area of the cone is infinity, however, when we put paint to color it, the paint passes through the tunnel and it blocks at the point depending on the density of the paint. The paint for us is the observer’s nested time cycle. The resolution of the solution is always ultimate.

One to one correspondance between the Banach-Tarski paradox and the measurement in a fractal information theory: Suppose we have a nested time cycle sphere, like the one shown here, the observer would also be a sphere, it would sync with the paths and generate the connected path and form a “reality sphere” just like the one here. Creation of an identical information replica is its greatness because the solution of a problem is an infinite space.

One to one correspondance between the Hyper-webster dictionary and the generation of multiple spheres: If there are large number of observers, of course there are infinitely large number of observers, therefore large number of “reality spheres” will be produced and those would merge just like the Hyper-websters dictionary. All these spheres are distinctly produce, yet they create a singular identity. Imagine thousands of “reality spheres” being produced and all of them simultaneously hold the solution.

 

Going beyond Turing machine: World of technologies with “Infinite state” machines

Published December 30, 2014 by anirbanbandyo

Turing’s world of computing considers every single element is complete in itself, just like that a “matter” is complete; nothing inside/outside is changing it. Completeness enables discrete and binary true/false argument to define it. We get a Turing world.

Recently, we proposed an Escape Time (ET) fractal tape, where, as we enter inside a cell of the tape, we find another tape, hence not a single cell in the entire tape network is defined (non-differentiable). This is not a Turing tape. This AjoChhand vision has one argument, one energy packet, one Turing like tape, one clock, one rhythm, one oscillator that encompasses the entire universe, but if we enter inside any of them, we find millions of those inside, the journey continue forever, whether we zoom in/out.

Unlike Turing, any “matter” is conceptually incomplete so we need matter+energy duality to connect all matters inside and outside. Conserved energy takes the form of periodic oscillation or rhythm and maintains time, but each rhythm has rhythms inside/outside. We cannot isolate any small piece of argument from tape network, hence, no bits or arguments like true/false, that leads to no classical information content. Observer/user is also part of the tape network. User’s sensory resolution limits isolate a part of limitless rhythm network that is “his” information-perception. Since “that” is not a discrete unit, it remains undefined, so entire rhythm net, is represented as matrix of truth with infinite dimensions, no rhythm is ever destroyed, no choice is ever rejected. This is an ET system, but self-similarity is not mandatory, so it is not a true fractal, possibly fractal-like.

Unlike Turing, our tape (AjoChhand tape) needs four new steps, resonate (with a rhythm), expand (self-assembly of rhythms), Phase transition (of rhythms), and spontaneous reply (the rhythms). Self-similarity of shape/rhythm appears/disappears with time, as rhythms couple/decouple with other rhythms, changes the structural symmetry of matters to memorize particular set of frequencies for a rhythm. The entire tape network is never-ending resonance chain of coupled matters that vibrate with rhythm, means, local rhythms vibrate as a distinct entity in parts of the tape.

Since observer/user is also part of the rhythms of the tape-network, it senses by perpetual local synchrony and de-synchrony with various parts of the tape, thus, its “sensing” not computation by classical theory of computation.